Erotics of Power
"A real spin on Leadership"
Why do cult leaders seduce faster than poets? Why does "dangerous but brilliant" make us dizzy while "safe but competent" sounds like a tax accountant's dating profile?
This episode dissects the neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and dark psychology behind humanity's most uncomfortable truth: power is an aphrodisiac...and we're all users!
From dopamine hits to Dark Triad seduction tactics, we explore why dominance hijacks attraction, how charisma weaponizes embodied cues, and what happens when followers confuse chemistry for love.
Featuring research on testosterone, transference, CEO worship, and cult dynamics...plus the uncomfortable question: what do you do once you realize you're hooked?
Visit our hub: https://unusualpractice.carrd.co Other site: https://unusualpractice.podview.com Main site: https://practicecharli.com
Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/unusual-practice/donations
Roger, Charlie, we're ready to rock. Picture a conference room in midtown Manhattan, 70 people crowned into folding chairs. The air smells like burnt coffee and expensive Cologne. Then she she walks in. Don't forget, don't like and subscribe.
She's not the CEO, not the keynote speaker, just a consultant nobody's even heard of. But the moment she reaches the front, something shifts. Backs straighten and side conversations stop. Someone drops their phone. She has not even said a word yet, but the room is already hers. This isn't charisma, it's not executive presence. It's something older, darker, and far more chemical like. Comments and subscribe. This is erotics, and power is the most potent aphrodisiac we refuse to admit we're hooked onto.
Today we're talking about why dominance makes us dizzy, why cult leaders get laid more than poets, why the phrase dangerous but brilliant exists, and safe but competent sounds like a Tinder bio written by a tax accountant. This is the most unusual. Practice. We think what you think, you know with Charlie. We are wired for this, all of us, and pretending otherwise is just another way of staying blind to the leash. Oh my God.
Let's start where it starts, in the bones, the blood, the brain. You think you're choosing who you're drawn to, but you're not, at least not entirely. Studies show that dominance signals, expansive posture, lower voice pitch, commanding non verbal displays reliably increased perceived attractiveness and influence mate selection and leadership choices even in brief encounters. This effect is tied to hormonal cues. Testosterone linked facial and behavioral traits boost perceived dominance, though they don't always correlate with long term relationship quality.
Translation. The guy who takes up space at the bar? The woman who holds eye contact a beat too long? They're broadcasting power. And your limbic system? Oh boy is it listening. But here's the part no one really talks about. This is not rational attraction, it is chemical compliance. When we encounter high power individuals, our brains light up reward circuits driven by dopamine, the same neurotransmitter that fires when you gamble, eat chocolate or fall in love. in Group settings, oxytocin, often called the bonding hormone, also spikes, making powerful figures feel emotionally sticky even when logic says they shouldn't.
So yes, your ex with the motorcycle and that undiagnosed personality disorder, That wasn't bad taste. That was your ventral stratum getting high off someone who looked like they could protect you from a Saber toothed tiger or become one. Now here's the kicker. This wiring doesn't care about your values. It doesn't care that you read bell hooks. It doesn't care that you've been to therapy. It evolved in an environment where aligning yourself with the most dominant figure in the tribe often meant survival.
Not love. Not partnership, survival. The primatologist Franz Duvall spent decades studying chimpanzees and bonobos. He once said in a world where power determines access to food, mates and safety, the powerful aren't just admired, they're needed. Humans like to think we've transcended that world, but the spoiler is we have not. We've just moved indoors and given it a LinkedIn profile. You've got mail. OK, so let's kill the myth right now. Charisma is not magic. It's not a gift from the gods. It's not an energy you're born with or revive only certain souls emit.
Charisma is technology, a highly refined system of embodied signals that hijack attention, synchronize groups, and create the illusion of intimacy at scale. And here's what makes it so dangerous. It works even when you know how it works. Researchers studying charismatic leaders, from politicians to mega church pastors to startup founders, have identified A consistent behavioral signature. It's not what they say, it's how their body speaks first. Charisma emerges from embodied cues, gesture, voice, pitch, facial expression, confident movement that synchronize follower attention and create a felt connection.
Open hand gestures, animated voice tone, direct eye contact that lingers a half second longer than comfortable. These non verbal tactics alone can cultivate perceived charisma even when the content of the message is stripped away. In one study, researchers showed participants video clips of leaders speaking in Hebrew, but the viewers didn't speak Hebrew. They rated charisma based purely on body language. The results? Gestures, facial expressions, and vocal tone were sufficient to create perceptions of charisma without understanding a single word.
Charisma isn't what you say. It is how your body hijacks the room before your words arrive. And now here's the uncomfortable part. This system evolved not for truth but for coordination. Charismatic non verbal displays signal dual messages receptivity, which is warmth and attractiveness, and formidability, which is competence and power. And these cues activate both approach and avoidance. Motivational systems and observers. In other words, charismatic people make you want to get closer and submit at the same time.
It's the psychological equivalent of standing too close to a bonfire. Ever feel like the world's built to keep you small, distracted, and shallow? Unusual practice with Charlie Rips open those cracks through neuroscience, quantum weirdness, and hidden cultural truths while showing you how to think deeper, connect stronger, and heal what society broke. Get your uplifting dose every week, reset your perspective, and start believing in yourself again. This isn't advice, this is a wake up call. Two hours later.
And then there's beauty. People expect white, male, and attractive targets to be more charismatic, and research confirms this bias in leadership perception. Attractive people are perceived as possessing more favorable personality traits, particularly greater social competence, even though there's no demonstrated link between attractiveness and actual leadership effectiveness. Physical attractiveness is a strong predictor of being placed in formal leadership roles, the biggest driver being perceived warmth, which makes people believe attractive individuals will care about their well-being.
Beauty tricks us into trusting faster, listening harder, and granting authority. We haven't even verified. Fuck this shit, I'm out, the Roman poet Ovid wrote. A fair exterior is a silent recommendation. 2000 years later, 30 volunteers assessed CE OS leadership success based on appearance alone, and these ratings were significantly related to the profitability of the organizations the CE OS LED. We still can't tell the difference between a face that inspires confidence and a face that actually deserves it.
But here's where it gets darker. Because charisma doesn't just make people listen, it makes them comply. And when charisma pairs with moral vacancy, when the same embodied signals are wielded by people who see others as instruments, you don't get inspiration. You get predation. And we say bye bye. Now we arrive at the part that makes us even more uncomfortable. Sometimes the most magnetic people are also the most dangerous, not despite their cruelty, but because of it. Research consistently shows that dark triad traits, psychopathy and Machiavellianism are correlated with short term meeting success, particularly for men, though the link between these traits and short term meeting was stronger for men than for women.
Individuals higher on narcissism use more self promotion inmate attraction, while men higher on psychopathy employ similar tactics. Translation. Well, the person who talks about themselves relentlessly at a party, who seems utterly unbothered by social norms, who radiates a kind of lawless confidence, they're not succeeding in spite of those traits. Those traits are the strategy,
but here's where it gets twisted. Among all dark triad traits, Machiavellianism was the least attractive to the opposite sex, particularly for short term relationships in women. Likely because Macs tend to be far less extroverted than narcissists and psychopaths, and only narcissism was positively correlated to self perceived attractiveness and mate value in both sexes. Machiavellianism and psychopathy had no correlation with looks, and facial features associated with dark tried traits tend to be rated as less attractive.
So it's not that psychopaths are objectively hotter, it's that narcissists think that they are and the confidence becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. How are you? Doing Papas. Yeah, I'm OK You. You're even more ugly in television than reality. In chaotic, high stakes environments, war zones, failing companies, social upheaval, followers often prefer bold, daring leaders over cautious, deliberative ones. Men scoring highest on dark triad traits tend to have lower standards for short term mates, creating what researchers call a target rich mating environment.
They're not picky. They're efficient, and in unstable conditions, efficiency reads a strength. I mean, think about it. When resources are scarce or danger is imminent, the person who hesitates, who considers everyone's feelings, who weighs ethical implications, they kind of look weak. The one who acts without flinching, that person looks like salvation. Cult researcher John Yella Leach notes that probably every cult leader is a narcissist. And charismatic leaders thrive on chaos. They'll create crisis situations deliberately.
When they walk into a room, you never know if they're going to be kind or mean, create connection or danger. And their unpredictable nature allows them to maintain control. Unpredictability, therefore, is not a bug. It's the feature that keeps people hooked. They say money can't buy happiness. Look at the fucking smile on my. Face. All right, so let's talk about Elizabeth Holmes. At its peak, blood testing company fairness was valued at $9 billion, and CEO Elizabeth Holmes and her trademark black turtleneck was heroically portrayed on magazine covers as a charismatic, pioneering leader who inspired awe from her employees.
The company collapsed in 2018 when it was disclosed that the firm's supposedly revolutionary technology simply didn't work, and Holmes was sent to prison for defrauding investors. But before the fall, Holmes mastered every signal of charismatic authority. The deep voice artificially lowered the unblinking stare, the grandiose vision, the Steve Jobs cosplay. She wasn't just selling technology. She was selling herself as a vessel for transformation. Harvard Business School professor Rakesh Khurana has written extensively on how the cult of the charismatic CEO emerged in recent decades, placing much of the blame on institutional investors who fostered ACEO centric view of corporations.
When companies failed to meet performance expectations, boards turned to outsiders to act as saviors, believing that charismatic leadership could provide a guiding vision for the organization. But charismatic authority often professes a love of egalitarianism and empowerment. Yet such noble sounding declarations can and frequently do turn out to be self deluding or manipulative.
So let's be clear, Recognizing why we're attracted to power is not the same thing as justifying it. The point of this episode isn't to romanticize cult leaders or excuse CEO Malphans. The point is to understand the mechanism. How charisma weaponizes our evolved vulnerabilities. How dark tried traits exploit short term meaning psychology. How crisis makes us crave certainty, even when that certainty is a lie.
Researchers Manfred Ketz Devries and Charles Lindell explained that followers often seek to compensate for their own self esteem issues and weak identities by identifying with a charismatic leader who provides what they feel is missing in themselves, a process called transference.
This view of how followers come to identify and worship charismatic leaders sheds light on influence processes associated with cult leadership and leaders with compromise moral standards who nevertheless command strong support and devotion from their followers. You don't fall for dangerous people because you're stupid. Nope. You fall because your brain is doing exactly what it evolved to do, seek protection, status and meaning in the presence of someone who looks like they have access to all three.
Every civilization had its God of power, Zeus, Shiva, Pharaoh, CEO. They all wore the same face, the one that could command a crowd's breath.
The question isn't why we worship them, it's why we keep pretending that we don't. Power isn't just out there, it's the shadow cast by our longing and until we face that, someone will always weaponize it. The question isn't why we're seduced by power. The question is what do we do once we realize the drug is in our veins?
Until next time, don't forget to like, share or comment and please follow. It's the only way I can improve. Until then, be curious. Not just about the world, but about the forces moving through you. Curiosity is how we stay free in a world built to hypnotize. See you next week. This was Charlie signing out. Somebody just followed me. I'm Donald Trump and I. Approve this message.
Podbean