Overthinking vs. Action: Why Smart People Stay Stuck

You've researched it. You've planned it. You've made the list, color-coded the folder, and opened seventeen browser tabs. And somehow, nothing has actually happened. This episode is about that. That overthinking isn't preparation, it's protection. Protection from the moment you find out whether the thing actually works. We go deep into the neuroscience, drag Hamlet and Leonardo da Vinci into it, and land somewhere useful. Thi is the honest conversation smart people rarely have with themselves.

Visit our hub: https://unusualpractice.carrd.co Other site: https://unusualpractice.podview.com Main site: https://practicecharli.com

Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/unusual-practice/donations

Roger, Charlie, we're ready to rock.

So I need to start with a confession. OK, I was preparing for this episode for so damn long, but at one point I opened a new tab to research how the hell to research better? And that is when I have to sit with myself for a second or maybe a bit longer. Oh. My God.

So I had a folder, a color-coded subfolders inside the subfolders, a pros and cons list about the structure of the pros and cons list. And the whole time it genuinely felt like I was doing something great, like I was being responsible and thorough and earning the right to eventually one day maybe start. Does it sound familiar? Like, comment and subscribe. Because here's the thing I want to talk about today. Overthinking. Not in the self help be just believe in yourself kind of way, but actually what it is, why it happens and well, why.

And this is the part I find a bit unsettling. You see, it targets smart people the hardest. Not that I'm saying I'm smart, but I'm really not the dumbest in the flock. Certainly not the most intelligent either. Now, it doesn't hit the people who don't care. It hits the people who care so much that their brain builds an entire palace of preparation just to avoid the moment of actually doing the thing. Look. Like you too.

If you've ever been almost ready for six months, this one is for you. And make no mistake, I've done this to myself 101 times. Easy. So let's just get into it today. Don't forget. Don't like and subscribe? I'm going to start with a dude we all know about Hamlet, because if we're going to talk about overthinking, we have to talk about the most famous overthinker in literary history. This is the most unusual practice. Rethink what you think you know with Charlie. His father's ghost shows up and tells him.

Your uncle poisoned me, stole the throne and married your mother. Go get revenge. That's it. That's the brief, crystal clear, straightforward assignment. And instead, Hamlet spends 4 hours of stage time in Shakespeare's longest play, by the way, philosophizing, questioning reality, staging elaborate theatrical productions to confirm what the ghost already told him, and most famously, asking to be or not to be. Which, when you really strip it down, is a man asking himself whether he should bother existing rather than just doing the thing everyone is waiting for him to bloody well do.

While Hamlet is basking an indecision, events move on around him as they do, and the living death he achieves by not taking action ends up being worse than the actual death he suffers anyway. He accomplishes nothing, everyone dies, and the whole damn thing becomes a tragedy in the most literal possible sense. Shakespeare wasn't just writing a play, he was diagnosing a pattern in human behavior that would remain completely unchanged for 400 years later. The Ghost gave Hamlet 100% of the information he needed.

He still managed to find a way to need more.

And that's the thing. Overthinking isn't really about information. No, it's about what information is being used for. Because your brain is not actually trying to solve the problem, it's trying to, as always, feel safe. It's using analysis as a way to stay still while looking busy. Neuroscience actually has a name for this mechanism. In the prefrontal cortex, your brain's executive center, a recursive evaluation loop can form where the brain continuously re weighs evidence and simulates outcomes for a single decision without ever reaching A threshold for action.

And for any complex decision, total certainty is impossible, so the loop just never resolves. What really got me, though, was a 2017 study in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology. They found the people who scored high on perfectionism showed significantly larger neural responses not just for actual errors, but for possible errors. Their brains were essentially treating uncertainty itself as a mistake. So every time you approach decision and don't know exactly how it will go, which is every decision ever, your brain fires the same alarm it fires when you actually do mess up.

So no wonder it's so uncomfortable to just commit to something. Your nervous system is genuinely treating the unknown like a threat, and telling a chronic overthinker to just decide is about as useful as telling someone with an overactive smoke detector to just ignore it. The alarm feels real, it is real. The house just isn't on fire. Ever feel like the world's built to keep you small, distracted, and shallow? Unusual practice with Charlie rips open those cracks through neuroscience. Quantum weirdness and hidden cultural truths while showing you how to think deeper, connect stronger, and heal what society broke.

Get your uplifting dose every week, reset your perspective and start believing in yourself again. This isn't advice, this is a wake up call. Now here's the cultural layer that I want to talk about. The Western world has a very specific relationship with overthinking. We've rebranded it as being thorough due diligence. We schedule meetings about meetings. There's an entire consulting industry built on the idea that more analysis is always more responsible. But then take a look at what Japan built philosophically.

There's a concept called of course I'm butchering this Ichigo Ichi, a meaning one time, One meeting, which comes from 16th century Zen Buddhist tea ceremonies. It was formalized by Team Master Senro Riku, and the idea is that every moment is singular and unrepeatable. It will never happen again in exactly this way. In martial arts, teachers use the same phrase to remind students that in a real confrontation, you cannot stop and try again. Each action must be singular and decisive because moments only come once.

There's no loop. There's no one more thing to consider. There is the moment, and then there is the moment that has passed. I Bushido this. And alongside that, there's Kaizen, the philosophy of continuous small improvement, which is built on the idea that perfection doesn't exist, and nor should it, because if you believe perfection exists, you give yourself permission to stop improving the moment you think you've reached it. The West is agonizing about getting it perfect. Japan built Toyota. The connection is not subtle, but here's the part I still think about.

And this is where the research gets a little bit cruel. Overthinking doesn't just delay your work, it actually makes you worse at it, and I can vouch for that. Stanford researchers monitored students brains with an MRI while they created complex drawings. The more conscious thought they applied to the task, the worse the result got. So after three hours of preparing, you are measurably less capable than if you just opened the file and started. This is not a motivational reframe, that's a controlled experiment.

The preparation is eating the performance. Hello, George. OK, so to be fair, not all deep thinking is avoidance. There is a real difference between productive reflection and the kind that just generates more fog. And I think collapsing those two is exactly how smart people justify being stuck for years. Problem solving converges. Each loop gets you closer to a direction. You go in with a question. You come out eventually with something resembling a decision, even a messy, imperfect 1. Overthinking diverges.

You go in with one concern and come out with 11. The problem hasn't shrunk to actually groan. You're not solving anything, you're just adding rooms to amaze. You built yourself the tell. Well, honestly, it's when the goal posts keep moving. Every time you get close to feeling ready, you discover there's one more thing you need to know first. One more person to ask, one more scenario to account for. That's not due diligence. That's the fear mechanism doing its job, and it's doing it very well. Unusual practice.

Rethink what you think you know. Take Leonardo da Vinci. He is the most fascinating case study in all of this because he was an undisputed genius and also, by every historical account, a spectacular procrastinator. It took him 16 years to finish the Mona Lisa. He left the Adoration of the Maggie and Jerome in the wilderness unfinished. He took 13 years to complete the Virgin of the Rocks. He only finished the Last Supper after his patron, Ludovico Sforza, literally threatened to stop paying him.

And when that patron complained about the pace, da Vinci's response was magnificent, he said. Men of lofty genius sometimes accomplish the most when they work the least, for their minds are occupied with their ideas and the perfection of their conceptions, to which they afterwards give form. Which is profound and also for being honest, a master class and reframing delay as depth. He completed only about 20 paintings in his lifetime, many of them unfinished, and in his later years, he questions himself saying.

Tell me if anything was ever done. Tell me if anything was done. On his deathbed, he said he had. I offended God and humanity in not having worked in my art as I should have. Leonardo da Vinci, possibly the greatest mind in human history, on his deathbed, mourning the unfinished work. So the idea that thinking long enough will somehow protect you from regret. Da Vinci is the counter argument to that in severe, heartbreaking detail. So let's talk about what this actually costs, because I think we're too easy on ourselves about it today.

Let's talk about the obvious stuff. Time, missed opportunities. The low grade anxiety of a thing that's always almost ready. Sure. But the sneakier damage is what researchers call the illusion of progress. When you're deep in planning and research mode, it genuinely feels productive. Your brain is engaged. You're making micro decisions. There's a sense of forward motion. Except the thing doesn't exist yet. You've been running on a treadmill facing a window. Analysis paralysis is when the fear of making an error outweighs the realistic expectation of success in a decision made in a timely manner, and it results in suppressed decision making as an unconscious effort to preserve existing options.

Preserve existing options. You're not being careful, you're keeping the exit open. Because as long as you haven't tried, you haven't failed. Given the situation of the world today, let's Mosey on to World War 2 with Winston Churchill because he saw this. He found out that landing craft designers were spending the majority of their time arguing over design changes rather than building anything. His memo to them had exactly 1 sentence. The maxim nothing avails but perfection may be spelled shorter, and he called it paralysis.

See, Churchill was not a man who enjoyed watching people overthink things while there was a war going on, and I can't quite say I blame him. Swarthmore College ran 4 studies on what they called maximizers, people who obsessively pursue the best possible option, versus satisficers, people who make a good enough call and move on. Maximizers reported significantly less life satisfaction, less happiness, less optimism, more depression, and more regret than satisfizers. And they experienced a greater increase in negative mood when they didn't perform as well as their peers.

So the people trying the hardest to get it right are statistically the least OK. That's not an irony, it's actually a pattern. The pursuit of the optimal decision is itself the source of suffering. And then there's the detail that I find almost funny and how brutal it is. Studies have found that other people, including complete strangers, are better at predicting your future satisfaction with a decision than you are yourself. All those hours of research, all that internal deliberation, and a random person who knows nothing about you, your context, or your options would predict your happiness with the choice more accurately than you would.

The information isn't protecting you, it's just making you feel like it is. In the corporate world, this plays out at a scale where the consequences are actually visible. Kodak. Blockbuster. BlackBerry. Remember Nokia? Companies full of smart, thorough, cautious people who analyzed until their competitors made the decision for them by taking the market. These weren't failures of intelligence, they were failures of action. The strategy was being debated while someone else was already executing. This guy was good.

All right Charlie, so just tell us what helps. And I want to be real here with you. The advice just start is not an advice. If it worked, we wouldn't need a whole episode about it. The reason it fails is that it ignores the actual mechanism. Because you see, you're not stuck because you're lazy or or undisciplined. You're stuck because your brain has decided that moving forward is dangerous. You cannot out muscle a threat response with enthusiasm. So here's what you can do instead. The first thing is to shrink the decision until it's smaller than the alarm system.

Don't decide to launch the business. Decide to write one sentence about the idea. Don't decide to start the book? Decide to open a document and type something bad. Your brain cannot catastrophize. Type something bad. There's no worst case scenario for a rough draft that doesn't exist yet. The Japanese concept of Kaizen, small continuous improvement rather than dramatic transformation, is built entirely on this. You don't fix the gap in one leap. You step, and then you step again. The second thing is to put a hard stop on the thinking phase.

Jeff Bezos has said most decisions should probably be made with around 70% of the information you wish you had, and the waiting for 90% usually means you've already waited too damn long. So give yourself a time limit on research. When it expires, it expires. Thinking is no longer the task. And the third thing, separate the reversible decisions from the irreversible ones and treat them differently. OK, what do I mean? Most of what you're agonizing over tends to be reversible. You can rename it, you can rewrite it, you can change direction, you can try again.

The catastrophic permanent outcome your brain keeps stress testing is usually not the real scenario. Treat reversible decisions like the low stakes calls they actually are. You're not signing something in blood, you're just going first.

Subscribe. Here's where I actually want to leave you, though, and I really mean this. A brilliant mind is a gift with a design flaw. It was built to solve problems. But when there's no clear problem, when the thing in front of you is just the ambiguous, uncontrollable mess of trying something new, your brain will manufacture problems to solve. This is the most unusual. Practice. You think what you think you know with Tony. And the manufactured ones feel just as urgent and important as the real ones, more sometimes because they're perfectly calibrated to your specific fears.

The loop doesn't stop because you gathered enough information. It stops when you decide the cost of not doing it is now higher than the cost of doing it imperfectly. That's the actual threshold. Every person who built something they're proud of cross that threshold while still scared, still uncertain, still without every answer. The fully formed perfect version that lives in your head, the one no one can criticize because it doesn't exist yet. That version, well, that version helps nobody, not even you.

Done exists. Perfect does not. And the only way to find out if your thing works is actually to let it be a thing that exists in the world. And that's the wrap on today's episode. And if you listen to this whole thing and your first instinct was I should think about what she said before I do anything with it, I see you. I really truly do. We are the same person. Trust me. I've done this over and over again. God, the years I've waited to start this podcast. Please start with someone who sends you 14 voice notes thinking through a decision and then does nothing about it.

And if you've been meaning to subscribe, leave a review, follow us somewhere, do not think about it anymore. Right now is the time while you're already here. The research is done, the information is sufficient, the decision is easy. We checked all 17 tabs. Until next time, stay curious, stay a little uncomfortable, and for the love of everything, just open that damn document. You got this, Mom, Somebody. Just followed me.