The Prince, the Prophet, and the Ghost: Power, Ego, and the Illusion of Control
"After 30 years in the corporate world, I’ve learned this: real power and leadership only come in three forms. You’re either driven by fear, by ambition, or by a calling.
Find out which one is leading you.
Look closely at who you’re truly leading - people, profit, or purpose.
And ask yourself why you’re playing this role at all. Because until you know that, you’re not leading - you’re performing." Charli
When Control Meets Chaos and Both Face Silence
Why do you feel trapped between who you pretend to be and who you actually are? Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and Lao Tzu walk into a room that doesn't exist - and they're about to explain the three ways you try to survive in a world that won't cooperate. This isn't about philosophy. It's about the internal waryou're having right now between control, rebellion, and surrender - and why getting stuck in just one is slowly suffocating you.
Visit our hub: https://unusualpractice.carrd.co Other site: https://unusualpractice.podview.com Main site: https://practicecharli.com
Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/unusual-practice/donations
Roger, Charlie, we're ready to. Rock. I want you to picture a room that doesn't exist in any particular time. 3 chairs, stone floor. The kind of cold that makes you wonder if the building has ever seen sunlight. On the left sits Machiavelli. I'm Donald Trump. And I approve this message.
His zinc stained fingers, his eyes that scan like he's reading a chess board only he can see. Across from him is Nietzsche pacing. He can't sit still, looks like he's 3 seconds away from either laughing or smashing something, and between them, barely there until you look directly at him. Lao Tzu barefoot, so still he could be furniture. Like, comment and subscribe. They've never met, they died centuries apart, and they're about to have the argument that's been running in your head your entire life without you even knowing it.
This is an episode about power, but not the kind that you think. Here's the wall that almost everyone hits. You've got a plan. It's sharp. You know what you want. You execute, You move people, you're 3 steps ahead. The plan works. Then something breaks. Smash the like button. Not because you screwed up, but because reality doesn't read scripts and you've got three options. Only three, and they've always been there. Option one, add more control. Tighten the system, move faster, predict harder, Become Machiavelli.
Option 2, burn it. Assert your will so hard the system can't contain you. Become unstoppable. Become Nietzsche. Option three, Stop. Watch, Let it move. Become Lao Tzu. Most people pick one and call it their personality. The smart ones realize that they're trapped. The rare ones learn to switch. But here's the thing people rarely share. All three were right, and all three were missing something absolutely fatal. Machiavelli leans forward. He's written about power from exile, which means he knows exactly what it looks like when you lose it.
Men are beasts dressed as angels. He says not poetically. Clinically. He's describing mechanics. Here's how humans actually work. Everyone sees what you appear to be. Almost nobody experiences what you really are. That's not cynicism. That's anatomy. Power isn't what you have, it's what people think you have. He's got this metaphor. You need to be a lion and a fox. The lion scares the wolves. The fox sees the traps. But here's the move. The lion can't defend against traps, and the fox can't defend against wolves.
Neither works alone. So you show the lion, but you act like the fox. Machiavelli sketches it out like a surgeon explaining an operation. A Prince takes credit for what works and blames nobles for what doesn't. The people need someone to protect them from, and that someone cannot be you. It's cold, but it works. Now Nietzsche hears this and smirks. You're Lion is chained to opinion. You call it rule, I call it slavery. And he's right. Nietzsche doesn't do strategy, He does combustion. His point is brutal and simple.
If you base your power in what people think of you, you're not ruling them, they're ruling you through their gaze. You've just built a prettier cage. Nietzsche saw humans as herd animals. No individual will, just group instincts. And the herd doesn't want greatness. The herd wants safety, comfort, the illusion that tomorrow will be exactly like today. So the herd punishes anyone who reminds them that change is possible. They call it morality. Nietzsche called it domestication. His move? Build men who obey only themselves, not tyrants.
People who've created their own values instead of inheriting the crowds values Master. Morality doesn't ask permission. It creates its own measure of worth and stands beyond good and evil. Machiavelli doesn't flinch. Try that in Florence. You'll end up executing. He's seen it. The person who transcends the rules becomes a threat. Threats get neutralized. The only way to survive is to look like you're playing while staying 7 moves ahead. Nietzsche, however, has his answer ready. Better executed than domesticated.
It's not bravado, it's a calculation. If the only way to stay alive is to surrender your will to the crowd's judgement, you're not alive. You're a puppet that breathes. For Nietzsche, that's worse than death. Meanwhile, Lao Tzu has been watching. Not judging, just watching. Finally, he looks up and says. You both make noise. The room gets quieter the strongest. Ruler is the one the people barely know exists. This lands differently because it's not argued, it's stated like a fact about water. Machiavelli's ruler has to constantly manage perception.
One mistake and the narrative collapses. Nietzsche's profit has to constantly prove transcendence. 1 moment of weakness and the movement devours him. But Lao Tzu is describing something else entirely. What if the actual move is to become so aligned with what's already happening that you actually disappear into it? Water doesn't fight the rock, but water shapes canyons. Water doesn't decide to be wet, it just is, and in being what it is, it moves through every system with almost no resistance. Wu Wei doesn't mean doing nothing, it means acting in perfect harmony with what wants to happen anyway.
Basically not forcing, but aligning. Machiavelli has to stay visible to stay safe. Nietzsche has to stay loud to stay free loud. SU just dissolves and somehow people follow the empty space he left behind. Ever feel like the world's built to keep you small, distracted, and shallow? Unusual practice with Charlie Rips open those cracks through neuroscience, quantum weirdness, and hidden cultural truths while showing you how to think deeper, connect stronger, and heal what society broke. Get your uplifting dose every week, reset your perspective, and start believing in yourself again.
This isn't advice, this is a wake up call. Now the part where it all breaks. Here is how they test their theories. Machiavelli builds his Kingdom. It stands. It's secure. The rivals are gone. The image is perfect. And then the paranoia begins. Because if you've built everything on being three moves ahead, and you know how fast that can reverse, you know the traps you've set, you know your vulnerabilities, which means you know they can be found. Machiavelli himself was tortured and imprisoned when the Medici returned to power, accused of conspiracy he apparently did not commit.
The master strategist destroyed by strategy. The palace stands, but the Prince is suffocating. Nietzsche builds his movement ideas so powerful people burn with them. Transcendence, creation, freedom from the herd. It works until it doesn't, because movements built on individual will have a structural flaw. Once you've rejected the crowd's values, you have no shared framework left. You're just people burning separately that either fragments into chaos or hardens into tyranny to prevent the chaos.
Nietzsche's own philosophy was warped by movements claiming his name. And Nietzsche himself, well, he went mad. Not spiritually, literally institutionalized, paralyzed. The will burned too hot, the fire consumes everything, including the prophet. Lao Tzu builds nothing and somehow becomes the most influential of all three, not because he accumulated power, but because he showed that power as the other two understood. It was the trap. The Taoist ruler is barely visible when the work is done. People say it happened to us naturally.
The sage walks away, untouched, unseen, and everyone follows. Not because they were commanded, but because they realized the freedom they wanted wasn't in the palace or the fire, it was in the space between. Now here's where this stops being philosophy and starts being your life. Because those three aren't just dead thinkers. They're running in your head right now. Machiavelli runs your career. He's the version of you that goes into the meeting and modulates just slightly depending on who's in the room.
He's LinkedIn. He's the e-mail voice that's different from your actual voice. He's the personal brand you're tending, like a garden that might die if you look away. It works, it protects you, but it also exhausts you. Nietzsche runs your rebellion. He's the part that's sick of the damn game, the part that wants to burn your LinkedIn and make something real. He's your side project, your creative work, your your authentic self. He's also the part that's tired, because resisting the system while living in it is like running a marathon uphill forever.
Oh shit, Lao Tzu runs The part of you that just watches both. The part that occasionally surprises you with clarity you didn't think through. The part that knows when to leave a conversation. The part that makes decisions without logic but feels right. Most people dismiss this as intuition. It's actually the deepest form of intelligence, Alignment with what's actually happening instead of what you think should happen. You can fool some of the people all of the time, and you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool mom.
Hand me your phone and go to your room. Now here's what kills most ambitious people. They think the goal is to reach a state where the system runs itself, where you don't have to move anymore, where you can rest. Machiavelli, Nietzsche, and Lao Tzu, we're all telling you the same truth in different languages. There is no final state, really. The Prince maintains power by moving before others see the move. The prophet transforms by destroying what he was yesterday, and the sage acts by not acting, by being so aligned.
There's no no friction. None of them get to stop, but the texture is different. The Prince stops and feels trapped. The prophet stops and feels dead. The sage stops and feels aligned. That's not philosophy, that's being human. All three were describing freedom they didn't fully have. Machiavelli wrote about power from exile, and he'd lost it. Nietzsche wrote about transcendence from a room, often in pain, unable to move his body the way he wanted to. And Lao Tzu withdrew from the world. Whether that was alignment or surrender, nobody actually knows.
None of them had the thing they were theorizing about. That's not a flaw, that's the point. Power is only visible when you've been without it, control only makes sense when you've lost it, and surrender only teaches when you still have to choose it. They were all describing escape routes from cages they built trying to escape other cages. That is not weakness, that's a human condition. Wearing philosophy like a suit. So here's the actual move, the one that changes everything. Power isn't to rule, nor to create, nor to vanish.
Power is knowing when to be each. Knowing when you need strategy and when strategy is just expensive fear. Knowing when rebellion is necessary and when it's narcissism with better branding. And knowing when to act and when your action is preventing something better. Most people get stuck in one. They become the strategist who never burns anything, basically a ghost in a suit, the rebel who never stops burning, martyr that nobody remembers, and the sage who only watches. Basically complicit by silence.
The rare person. They cycle through all three not perfectly, but fluidly. Their Machiavelli when the room requires it, their Nietzsche when something real needs to change and they're allowed to, when action would just create more friction. But here's the terrifying part. You cannot plan which one to be in advance, because the moment you systemize it, you're back to Machiavelli. You're calculating instead of present, the only way through sensitivity. Real sensitivity. The kind that notices when you're clinging to strategy because you're scared, when you're burning something just to prove you're free, or when you're watching because you're too afraid to participate.
And then choosing in the exact moment which version of power actually serves. Not which one makes you look best? Which one fits? I'm sorry, what Now? You must be thinking, well, who in the hell dresses this theory? Well, we've got somebody called Nelson Mandela. Remember the guy? He went from armed revolutionary to secret negotiator to president who forgave his torturers. Yay, Benjamin Franklin. He played the charming fool in French salons while running one of the most sophisticated intelligence operations in history, people who were called sellouts, frauds and traders precisely because they refused to stay locked in one mode.
Google. That they were Machiavellian when it mattered, Nietzschean when transformation was required, and Taoist enough to know when to step back and let the moment do the work. They broke the rules by knowing exactly which rules served the moment. And that's where it gets incredibly dangerous.
Everyone's trying to be in control. Control their image, their narrative, their brand. We call it authenticity, but it's performance. We talk about freedom, but we're slaves to perception. Every self-made icon today is part Machiavelli. Mastering optics, manipulating emotion, turning visibility into currency. The rebel influencer is part Nietzsche, preaching self, overcoming, reinventing the self like a God of algorithms. And somewhere in the quiet corners of burnout and digital disgust, there's Lao Tzu whispering Stop trying so hard.
The water always wins. We live at the intersection of their ghosts. Power will and surrender, colliding in real time.
Like comments and subscribe. Machiavelli, Nietzsche, Lao Tzu, Three men who never met but who still run the modern world. If the first taught us how to rule others, the second how to rule ourselves, and the third how to rule nothing at all, which one rules you? Oh, that's really naughty.
So when you go back into the world tomorrow, meetings, relationships, the internal war about who you're supposed to be, ask yourself, which one am I right now? Am I being strategic because the moment calls for it, or because I'm afraid? Am I rebelling because something needs to change or because I can't stand not being special?
Am I waiting because I'm aligned or because I've given up? If you can ask that question clearly. No judgment, no self protection. You've already moved beyond all three unusual practice. Rethink what you think. You know. Because the moment you can see yourself choosing, you're no longer trapped by the choice anymore. The palace still stands, the fire still burns, the ghost still walks. But you're not locked into one roll any longer. You're free to play all three. And that's the only power that actually matters.
If you liked it, share it. That's how this practice stays alive until next week. Somebody just followed me.
Podbean