The Arrangement - The Snake Room (Part 5/8)
Part 5 of 8. On the same day Jordan's Foreign Minister publicly condemned Israeli military action, Jordan's air force was in the sky shooting down Iranian missiles.
In this episode of The Arrangement, a special 8-part series from Unusual Practice, we go inside the Arab world's impossible position: the Sykes-Picot lines that made unified resistance structurally impossible, Jordan's water dependency on Israel, the Sunni-Shia split as a management tool used by every outside power that ever needed a reason to divide the region, the Abraham Accords as the moment the performance of solidarity ended, and Saudi Arabia's oil, the weapon that is also a hostage.
Sources:
1. Jordan shooting down Iranian missiles — Associated Press
https://apnews.com/article/jordan-intercept-iranian-missiles-israel
2. Jordan-Israel water and energy agreements — Al-Monitor
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/jordan-israel-water-gas-deal
3. Sykes-Picot Agreement — full text and analysis
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/sykes.asp
4. Abraham Accords — full text, White House
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/abraham-accords/
5. Sunni-Shia split historical origins — BBC Religion
https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/subdivisions/sunnishia_1.shtml
6. Saudi Arabia petrodollar arrangement — Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R47321
7. China-brokered Saudi-Iran normalisation 2023 — Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-iran-agree-resume-ties-reopen-embassies-2023-03-10/
Visit our hub: https://unusualpractice.carrd.co Other site: https://unusualpractice.podview.com Main site: https://practicecharli.com
Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/unusual-practice/donations
On the same day, Jordan's foreign minister stood at a podium and publicly condemned Israeli military action, calling it a violation of international law, demanding accountability, expressing outrage on behalf of the Palestinian people. Jordan's Air Force was in the sky shooting down Iranian missiles, therefore protecting Israel. The same Israel. The foreign minister had just condemned that. The podium. Same government, same day 2 completely opposite actions.
Roger, Charlie, we're ready to rock.
Like, comment and subscribe. This is not hypocrisy, and it is not confusion. It's also not necessarily weakness. It is, however, survival.
And once you understand why Jordan does this, you will understand why the entire Arab world operates the way that it does, and why the concept of Arab unity, the brotherhood, the solidarity, the shared cause, has always been, at its core, a performance. Unusual practice. Deeper than a TikTok, Tighter than a book.
Welcome back to The Arrangement. I am your host, Charlie, and this is Episode 5. We've entitled it The Snake Room. This episode is about what the Arab world actually is, not what it performs, not what it claims, what it actually is, structurally, historically, and politically. Because until you understand all that, the behavior of every Arab government in this conflict will continue to look like contradiction.
And it isn't contradiction. It is a system, a very old, very deliberate and highly brutal system.
The following moments may contain explicit language.
In episode 1, we established that the modern Middle East map was drawn in 1916 by two European men, Sykes and Picot, with a ruler and no regard for the people living there. But we need to go deeper into what those lines actually created. Because they didn't just draw borders, they created impossible states.
Countries with no natural internal coherence, built from incompatible tribes, sects and ethnic groups who had spent centuries in fluid, overlapping arrangements, suddenly locked inside rigid national borders and told to be 1 people. Iraq was handed to a Sunni ruling class over a Shia majority and a Kurdish minority. Three groups with profound historical tensions artificially unified under 1 flag. Lebanon was designed with a sectarian power sharing system. Christian president, Sydney Prime Minister, Shia speaker.
So mathematically precise and so structurally fragile that it has produced perpetual political deadlock for a century. Jordan was created almost as an afterthought, a territory without oil, without a coastline, without significant natural resources, handed to the Hashemite family as a consolation price after they were removed from Arabia by the Saudis. Jordan has no economic basis for independence. It survives on foreign aid, water agreement and the strategic usefulness of its geography. Kuwait was carved from what Iraqis considered their own southern territory, a source of grievance that Saddam Hussein used to justify his 1990 invasion and which continues to produce resentment.
These were not nations built from the will of their people. They were administrative units built from the interests of European empires and the governments that run them. Many of the monarchies and authoritarian states that have never permitted meaningful democratic participation derive their legitimacy not from their populations but from foreign military protection. Arab unity was never possible within this structure. It was designed not to be, and the leaders who perform it most loudly are always the ones most dependent on the foreign powers who benefit from the division.
Contrary to a lot of Arab beliefs, Jordan is not a hypocrite. Jordan is a man standing on a burning bridge, responsible for the people on both sides, with no other bridge to stand on. Here is Jordan's reality. More than 50% of Jordan's population identifies as Palestinian, either refugees from 1948 and 67 or their descendants. For those people, the Palestinian cause is not a foreign policy issue. It is their family, their memory, their identity. Jordan's king cannot ignore that population. If he is seen to be openly cooperating with Israel while Palestinians are dying, he risks the kind of internal instability that ends monarchies.
So he performs loudly, publicly, convincingly. He recalls the ambassador. He votes at the UN, he gives speeches, He gives the population what it needs to see. And simultaneously, Israel gives Jordan what it needs to survive. Israel provides Jordan with access to more than 100 million cubic meters of water per year. Under a treaty agreement, Israel provides Jordan with natural gas. Jordan has no significant water sources of its own. It is one of the most water scarce countries on earth. Without Israel's water, the population Jordan claims to be defending faces a humanitarian crisis of a different kind.
And underneath both of those realities, Jordan receives American military protection and billions in foreign aid that keep the Hashemite monarchy in power. America's military presence in Jordan is substantial and documented. American special forces operate from Jordanian territory. The King's survival depends on Washington's continued support. So the king shoots down Iranian missiles that night, protecting the military and intelligence relationships with Israel and America that his survival depends on, and condemns Israel at the podium that morning, protecting himself from his own population.
This is maybe not a man without principle. This is a man without options. He was handed an impossible state by people long dead. He is managing the contradictions they built with his survival and his family's survival as the only real objective. That is the snake room. And he did not build it. He was actually born into it. Now we need to address the Sunni Shia divide because it is real, it has 1400 years of genuine theological substance, and it is also simultaneously one of the most consistently weaponized divisions in modern geopolitics.
The split originated in 632-CE the year of Prophet Muhammad's death over the question of rightful succession to the leadership of the Muslim community. Sunnis followed the elected caliph, Abu Baker. Shia believed leadership should have passed to Ali, Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law. That disagreement calcified over centuries into two distinct theological and political traditions. Approximately 85 to 90% of the world's Muslims are actually Sunni. Shia Muslims are the majority in Iran, Iraq, Bahrain, and the new country you guys just heard about in the news, Azerbaijan, and significant minorities in Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Pakistan and India.
Now here is how it has been weaponized. In the 1980s, America backed Sunni dominated Iraq against Shia Iran, explicitly framing the Iran Iraq War as a sectarian conflict in which the Sunni Arab world needed to be supported against Persian Shia expansionism. This framing served American interests. It kept Gulf Arab states, primary oil suppliers, primary weapons customers aligned against Iran. Then in 2003, America removed Sunni Saddam and handed Iraq to its Shia majority, effectively expanding Iranian influence in the region it had just spent a decade containing.
Saudi Arabia uses the Sunni Shia split domestically. Its Wahhabi religious establishments frames Shia Islam as heretical, which conveniently makes every Shia majority government in the region a theological enemy as well as a political one. Saudi Arabia's Shia minority, concentrated in the oil rich Eastern Province, is systematically marginalized. The theology justifies what is fundamentally a power arrangement. Iran uses it from the other direction, positioning itself as the defender of the oppressed.
Shia funding Hezbollah in Lebanon, the youthis in Yemen, Shia militias in Iraq. Not from theological sincerity, but from strategic calculation. Iran's reach across the region runs along the Shia Crescent, a geographic arc of Shia majority or significant Shia communities from Tehran through Baghdad through Damascus to Beirut. The split Israel, the suffering It produces Israel. But neither Saudi Arabia nor Iran is managing it for the benefit of Muslim communities. Both are using it as a management tool for regional dominance and outside powers.
America, Britain, France, Israel use it to prevent the Arab and Muslim world from ever consolidating enough to act collectively in its own interest. Now, in September 2020, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain formally normalized relations with Israel, the first Arab states to do so since Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994. The agreements were called the Abraham Accords. Morocco and Sudan followed. Saudi Arabia began moving toward normalization before October 7th, 2023 interrupted the process. This was presented to the world as a historic breakthrough for peace, a new era of Arab Israeli cooperation, a moment of hope.
But here is what it actually was. It was the formalization of relationships that already existed. Intelligence sharing between Gulf States and Israel had been running for years, quietly, practically without public acknowledgment. Military coordination against Iran was already operational. Economic relationships were already in place through back channels. What changed was not the substance. What changed was the performance. The Gulf states decided they no longer needed to maintain the fiction of solidarity with the Palestinian cause because their populations were sufficiently controlled, their economies sufficiently dependent on Western investment, and their security sufficiently reliant on American military presence that they could absorb the political cost of public normalization.
The Abraham Accords didn't create new relationships. They just retired an old performance. And the Palestinian people whose cause was traded away in exchange for American weapons guarantees and economic investment deals that benefited Gulf royal families were not consulted. They were not compensated. They were not even informed in advance. The Palestinian cause was not abandoned in 2020. It was abandoned long before that. 2020 was just the year the paperwork was signed in public. Saudi Arabia sits at the center of this entire arrangement, and its position is the most paradoxical of all.
Saudi Arabia has the world's largest proven oil reserves outside Venezuela. It produces approximately 9 to 10 million barrels of oil per day. Through OPEC, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, it has historically been able to influence global oil prices by adjusting production levels. This is real power, guys. Documented, measurable, consequential power. But that power has a structural constraint that is almost never explained to Western audiences. Saudi Arabia prices Saudi Arabia prices its oil in U.S. dollars.
This is not a technical detail. This is the foundation of the entire global financial order. The agreement was formalized in 1974, two years after Nixon ended the dollar's convertibility to gold. the US dollar needed a new anchor. Saudi Arabia agreed to price all oil sales in dollars and invest its surplus oil revenue in U.S. Treasury bonds. In exchange, America guaranteed Saudi security with military protection and weapons sales. The result? Every country on earth that needs oil, which is every country on earth needs U.S. dollars to buy it.
Which means every country on earth is perpetually in the market for American currency. Which is what gives the United States the ability to run perpetual trade deficits, finance its military empire, and enforce economic sanctions without equivalent damage to its own economy. Saudi Arabia's weapon is its oil, but the oil is priced in a currency that belongs to someone else, which means Saudi Arabia cannot fully use its weapons without the permission of the country that controls the currency. The weapon is also a hostage.
China understands this. China has been quietly, patiently, systematically building the infrastructure to price oil in yuan, conducting pilot transactions, signing bilateral agreements, constructing alternative payment systems that bypass the actual dollar. If Saudi Arabia ever prices oil in yuan at scale, the Petro dollar arrangement collapses. The implications for American financial power are structural and very severe. This is why underneath every Middle East conflict, underneath the religious language, the terrorist designations, the humanitarian justifications, there is always a currency question, always a resource question, always a question about who controls the pricing of the thing.
The world cannot live without that. Is the arrangement underneath the arrangement? Most people are watching the war, a few are trying to understand it. This series is for the second group, 8 episodes. Every thread connected all sourced the arrangement only on unusual practice. There is one more layer to the Arab world that almost never appears in Western coverage The difference between Arab governments and Arab people. You see ordinary Arab citizens across Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states, Morocco.
They feel the Palestinian cause viscerally. It is not an abstraction for them. It is in their media, their mosques, their family conversations, their collective cultural memory. The images from Gaza and Lebanon produce genuine grief and genuine rage for many, and their government knows this, and their governments use it as a pressure valve. Controlled outrage, permitted grief, protests allowed to a point, contained before they become of course, movements and state media covers Palestinian suffering extensively, keeping the population's anger directed outward toward Israel and America and away from the governments that are simultaneously sharing intelligence with Israel and purchasing weapons from America.
The Arab St. has always been more honest about this war than the Arab governments. Ordinary people in Cairo and Amman and Riyadh will tell you what their foreign ministers never will. That this has always been about power, that the Palestinian cause was always more useful as a symbol than as a commitment, that their own governments have failed them as comprehensively as foreign powers have. But the Arab St. has no mechanism to change any of this. Most of these are states with no free elections, no independent judiciary, no Free Press and security services that have been extensively trained, often by American and British advisors, to contain domestic dissent.
The Arab world is not confused. It is not divided by religion alone, it is a collection of populations who understand their situation very clearly and governments who have been structured, funded and protected specifically to ensure that understanding never translates into any form of change really. Jordan shoots down missiles while condemning the country it's protecting. Saudi Arabia performs Palestinian solidarity while prepositioning oil reserves for a war it knew was coming. Oh my gosh, did you hear that?
The Abraham Accords formalized relationships that had existed secretly for years. The Sunni Shia split is 1400 years old and has been weaponized by every outside power that ever needed a reason to divide the region. And underneath all of it, a currency arrangement that makes the world's most powerful oil producer A hostage to the country that prints the money. And amidst all that, a whole bunch of uneducated buffoons out on the streets thinking they know what the hell they're talking about. Don't forget and like and subscribe.
Every source in this episode is documented and LinkedIn the description In episode 6, we leave the Middle East entirely. We're off to Venezuela, to Greenland, to Panama, to Colombia, to Latin America, who are the same template, the same resource logic, the same Monroe Doctrine mentality is being applied right now. Watch out. Different continent, some different names, but an absolute identical architecture. Unusual practice. Deeper than a TikTok, Tighter than a book. Because this war was never a Middle Eastern war.
It was always a global one. I'm Donald Trump, and I approve this message.
This was the arrangement. Because history didn't just happen, it was totally arranged. Somebody just followed me.
Podbean